Home / News From Nigeria / Local News / Prof. Osinbajo set to drag FFK to Court , seeks ₦2b damages against Fani-Kayode over oath comment

Prof. Osinbajo set to drag FFK to Court , seeks ₦2b damages against Fani-Kayode over oath comment

APC’s VP applicant, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo has initiated lawful activities against Femi Fani-Kayode over the announcement he made a weekend ago that he (Osinbajo) made a solemn vow with previous Lagos State Governor, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to to step down six month after election.
prof_osinbanjo_mother

Osinbajo, through his attorney, Femi Falana is looking for N2billion harms for the charged defamatory articulation, he is likewise requesting a withdrawal of the announcement and a statement of regret which must be disclosed on four TV slots and distributed in four national daily papers.

“The direct meaning, purport and innuendo or insinuation of the false, misleading and defamatory statement is that our client, Prof. Osinbajo is deceitful and participating in a devise that constitutes subterfuge and lacks integrity in concert with others who you also describe as evil, insensitive, wicked, selfish and desperate.” the statement read in part

Falana said if Fani-Kayode doesn’t comply with his demands, they would proceed to court to seek redress as he portrayed Osinbajo, who’s a pastor and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, in a very bad light

About Lolade

VI

Viral Video

Support Ooduarere

SUPPORT OODUARERE
Scan QR code below to Donate Bitcoin to Ooduarere
Bitcoin address:
1FN2hvx5tGG7PisyzzDoypdX37TeWa9uwb
x

Check Also

Venezuela

🇺🇸⚖️🇻🇪 TOP 10 BS DEFENSES OF THE U.S. COUP AGAINST VENEZUELA

Peter Joseph – author of Zeitgeist series ➡️#1 “Illegitimacy” of Nicolás Maduro’s Election Debunked: (a) Irrelevance under international law Whether Maduro’s election meets U.S. approval standards is entirely irrelevant. The internal electoral affairs of a sovereign nation are not the business of another sovereign nation. This principle is foundational to international law and the UN Charter. There is no legal mechanism that allows one state to overthrow another based on disputed elections. (b) Blatant historical hypocrisy The idea that the ...